Faculty Letter to President Reif in Support of Professor Gang Chen
January 21, 2021
Dear President Reif:
As colleagues and friends of MIT Professor Gang Chen, we share our dismay and pain over his recent arrest . We all know Professor Chen as a truly beloved teacher, scholar, scientist, mentor, colleague, and world-leading academic. We also know him as a loyal and devoted member of the MIT community. Professor Chen has served MIT with distinction over decades through his extraordinary scientific work, his profound contributions to education, and his leadership. His work has contributed significantly to American scientific welfare and economic growth, as well as to MIT’s worldwide scientific standing. All his global work has been furthering MIT’s mission “to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.”
We stand in solidarity with our colleague. We wish to express our appreciation for the support that MIT leadership is providing to Professor Chen as he prepares to defend himself [2, 3]. We feel that he deserves full support and commitment from MIT. Moreover, we are writing to encourage you and MIT to stand forthrightly, proudly, and energetically behind Professor Chen.
With the information that is publicly available [1, 2], we are writing to share our concerns both on the allegations against Professor Chen and its implications for open academia and intellectual freedom – essential elements of progress towards solving the World’s greatest challenges. We are troubled that the complaint against Professor Chen vilifies what would be considered normal academic and research activities, including promoting MIT’s global mission.
We recognize and respect that the United States government has an interest in keeping any country from stealing intellectual property. Many of the signatories to this letter are inventors of record on hundreds of patents. We recognize the importance of protecting the rights that patents confer. We also recognize that the United States Government has expressed concern that China uses illicit means to steal intellectual property . We strongly support efforts to oppose any such activities conducted by any foreign country.
But we are baffled by many elements of the official complaint  and the associated public statements  against Professor Chen. The criminal complaint against Professor Chen has nothing to do with protecting intellectual property. As published, it is deeply flawed and misleading in its assertions. At best, it represents a deep misunderstanding of how research is conducted or funded at a place like MIT. The official complaint is filled with allegations and innuendo based on what are, in fact, some of the most routine and even innocuous elements of our professional lives. Standard practices such as writing recommendations for our students so that they might receive fellowships or other prestigious and well-deserved career advancements, are portrayed as some sort of collusion with outside forces in an effort to help them steal American technology. Our routine participation in the evaluation of research proposals seems to be viewed in a similar manner. The fact that we do not report all of these activities in our own research proposals is used as a basis for allegations of intentional wrongdoing, when in fact information about these practices is a well-known and is a routine requirement of our job. In many respects, the complaint against Gang Chen is a complaint against all of us, an affront to any citizen who values science and the scientific enterprise.
While the full extent of the charges against Professor Chen are not known at this time, the criminal complaint as published to justify Professor Chen’s arrest already contains some deeply flawed and misleading statements:
That since 2013 “CHEN and his research group has received approximately $29 million of foreign funding, including $19 million from the PRC’s Southern University of Science and Technology [SUSTech].”
Our understanding is that Professor Chen did not receive $29 million. MIT was the recipient of this money, which benefited the Institute, the research programs of many of its faculty, and its students. Singling him and his research group out as the “sole” recipient is simply wrong. The partnership with SUSTech was approved and overseen by MIT at the highest levels.
That SUSTech operates as a proxy to the Chinese government and thus is not a legitimate organization to collaborate with.
MIT has created a formal Center with SUSTech University. It is MIT who appointed Professor Chen as the Faculty Leader of this Center. The mission of this center is to encourage scientific and educational exchange, which is exactly what Professor Chen has done under its auspices. MIT has similar relationships with universities and other entities from other countries, as well as China. Most major universities in the world are public institutions and can be described reasonably as belonging to some arm of their country’s governments. If leaders in the U.S. government believe that cooperative research relationships with them are improper, the issue could be addressed legislatively or with executive authority.
That Professor Chen hid his affiliation and collaborations with China in applying and reporting on a DOE grant and in doing so committed “wire fraud,” a federal felony.
Professor Chen’s scientific collaborations and broader connections to China are a matter of extensive disclosure and public record. They are anything but hidden from the eyes of the public, let alone the sophisticated grant reviewers at the DOE. Professor Chen routinely, consistently, and extensively credited these scientific collaborations and funding in his publications available on public databases before and during this grant execution. His CV, available for download on MIT’s website, contains 62 references to China, and his publications cite international funding specifically from the very sources claimed in the complaint to be “hidden.” We emphasize that more generally, the extensive collaborative efforts that Professor Chen is involved in are far from secret.
That Professor Chen recommended students for positions in China and for scholarship awards funded by the Chinese Government. That Professor Chen served as a reviewer for the National Science Foundation of China and in doing so served the PRC.
Recommending students for international positions and awards, as well as reviewing proposals and projects for the scientific community in the U.S. and world-wide, is an essential and routine part of our job as faculty. That this activity would be portrayed as improper, un-American, or as a service to a foreign power is an affront to all of us. Moreover, reviewing scientific proposals and recommending students for positions and awards is a routine activity. There are many innocuous explanations for omissions on forms.
That Professor Chen “knowingly and willfully defrauded [the Taxpayers] out of $19 million in federal grants by exploiting our system to enhance China’s research in nanotechnology.” — FBI Special Agent Joseph R. Bonavolonta 
We believe that there is no substantiation provided to this broad and unqualified accusation. Professor Chen’s research at MIT has been funded in part through federal grants over the years. Professor Chen’s research has benefitted American science and technology, MIT’s worldwide scientific standing, and the global scientific community, as well as Professor Chen’s many American and international students. Dozens of scientific publications demonstrate that Professor Chen’s intent and use of research support were consistent with MIT’s core mission of conducting outstanding basic scientific research.
These misleading statements lead us to question the motivation for taking the extreme step of arresting Professor Chen, a dedicated scientist and educator performing his duties at MIT. Although the criminal investigation apparently started more than a year ago, we find it noteworthy that U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling commenced the arrest in the last few days of his tenure. Attorney Lelling was appointed by President Trump and is a member of the Steering Committee of the DOJ’s “China Initiative,” which has spearheaded the use of “innovative prosecutorial methods”  to target academics who are from or have participated in scientific exchange with China. The racial undertones of this campaign are reflected in the following quote from Lelling himself in a recent interview for Science  “…unfortunately, a lot of our targets are going to be Han Chinese. If it were the French government targeting U.S. technology, we’d be looking for Frenchmen.” Our concerns are compounded by the number of investigations involving Chinese-American scientists and other scientists of Asian and Asian-American descent conducted by federal authorities in the United States in recent years .
Finally, we appreciate your and MIT’s support of Professor Chen. We understand that the Institute is supporting him financially and providing him with the information he needs to defend himself. We also understand that preparations are underway to support Professor Chen’s students and research activities. We stand ready to work with you in whatever way is necessary to help in this difficult time.
We also urge that MIT assume leadership in transforming this difficult time to a learning moment, in which the allegations against Professor Chen are discussed in the context of defending academic freedom in this country. In many respects the defense of Professor Chen is the defense of the scientific enterprise that we all hold dear — we are all Gang Chen.
~170 MIT faculty (1/26/21)
- Criminal complaint HSI Special Agent Matthew McCarthy on Jan. 13, 2021; https://www.wwlp.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2021/01/Chen-Gang-criminal-complaint.pdf
- Remarks in press conference by FBI Special Agent in Charge Joseph R. Bonavolonta; https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/boston/news/press-releases/fbi-special-agent-in-charge-joseph-r-bonavolontas-remarks-at-press-conference-announcing-arrest-of-mit-professor-gang-chen
- The federal government worldwide threat assessment; https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/2019-ATA-SFR—SSCI.pdf
- Op-ed in the Boston Globe on Feb. 11, 2020, written by U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling and FBI Special Agent in Charge Joseph Bonavolonta; https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/02/11/opinion/intel-chinas-counterintelligence-threat-america/
- U.S. Attorney Andrew Lelling interview with Science on Feb. 3, 2020; https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/us-prosecutor-leading-china-probe-explains-effort-led-charges-against-harvard-chemist